Naples City Council Bristle at Cost of New Radios; Suggest Officers Share

By Jenna Buzzacco-Foerster, Naples Daily News
Original publication date:  June 26, 2011

Naples, Fla. — Naples police Chief Tom Weschler was ready for a fight.

He knew City Council would frown at some of his fiscal 2011-12 budget requests.

But Weschler said recently he never expected to have to go to bat over something he deems an essential tool of the trade: portable police radios.

“I was surprised,” Weschler said. “Each one of those requests has a department ranking, and you’ll note (police radios) were No. 1 and No. 2 on our list.”

Weschler earlier this month requested $48,000 a year for the next five years for portable radios. That sum would buy about 15 radios a year, “thereby maintaining a reasonable level of quality public safety radio communications,” his request stated.

Weschler requested an additional $13,000 in fiscal 2011-12 to replace mobile radios in police cars. The money would be the last phase of a six-year replacement plan.

But council members took issue with the costs, and some said they didn’t know whether it was financially viable for the department to continue to give each officer his or her own radio.

While council members didn’t outright deny the request, they did ask that Weschler come up with other alternatives – particularly officers sharing the radios – before the budget comes back for final adoption.

“I don’t know how many radios we bought in the last six years,” Councilman Gary Price said during the June 13 council meeting. “I don’t think we have the financial ability to spend in this department like we have (in the past). … I don’t know how we can afford a radio for every officer.”

Southwest Florida law enforcement officials recently said asking officers to share radios is like having an unreliable cellphone: There’s no guarantee it will be ready to use when you need it most.

“It’s the most valuable piece of equipment they have,” said Tim Day, director of the Southwest Institute for Public Service. “All of us have had bad communications. And at the end of the day, you have to trust your police chief that he doesn’t want to spend money frivolously.”

Day, a former police officer and onetime Cape Coral City Council member, said sharing equipment is a “horrendous idea.”

“Equipment in this profession, honestly whether it’s vehicles or whether it’s their radios, lasts longer when you have one person taking care of it,” Day said. “What would you do if you handed off a radio at the end of the shift, and the battery wasn’t working? When you put a name on it, it’s the (person’s) responsibility.”

Naples isn’t the only law enforcement agency that assigns each officer his or her own radio. Deputies with the Collier County Sheriff’s Office and Lee County Sheriff’s Office are assigned their own portable radios, officials said recently.

“In our opinion, logistically and operationally it makes sense for an officer to have an assigned radio and we believe it is a small price to pay for officer safety,” Lee County Chief Deputy Rob Homan said in an email.

Greg Smith, the Collier sheriff’s chief of administration, agrees. Smith said the office hasn’t looked into whether deputies could share radios.

Collier County’s replacement plan requires radios be replaced at the six-year mark. The county follows guidelines set by the state’s Department of Management Services, but Smith said with budgetary constraints in recent years the county has been “trying to get a little more serviceability” out of them by keeping the radios a bit longer.

The county also isn’t replacing as many radios a year as it once did.

Still, Smith said $48,000 a year – or about $240,000 over five years – isn’t a bad deal, considering the county budgeted $180,000 in fiscal 2011 for all radio repairs.

Collier County government spent about $396,000 on radios in fiscal 2010.

Weschler said it’s important to know that the portable radios, which run about $3,200 per radio, aren’t the same type of police radio residents can pick up at an electronics store.

Instead, the radios have several frequencies for communication and are programmed with an emergency button an officer can push if he can’t radio back for help.

Once an officer hits the button, the city’s communications center is informed of who may be in distress. That speeds up the response time, and gives dispatchers a clearer picture of what could be happening.

Councilman Sam Saad said he thought Weschler could have done a better job of explaining that feature during the City Council meeting earlier this month. Saad said knowing that feature is there makes him feel “very comfortable with the decision” not to cut funding.

Price, however, still isn’t completely comfortable with the cost.

He said he plans to have a conversation with Weschler about all of the features so he can better understand the needs of the department.

“It always defaults in to (that) our guys aren’t going to be safe,” Price said last week. “Every year we’re buying radios. I’m just trying to look for common-sense solutions.”

Day said he believes the best solution is to take the chief’s recommendation to heart.

“It’s for the public safety and for the officer’s safety. We don’t hand them off like a piece of equipment that doesn’t matter. They need to be taken care of because they do matter,” Day said.

“My alternative is there wouldn’t be any other alternative.” 

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy 

 

Tags:

  • Roadwingguy

    Really? Keep the politicians away from a police chiefs work. You balance your budgets while the chief runs his department.

    • Chris Bertolini

      I agree completely!  I have NEVER understood why council members / commissioners have the ability to cut line items from a departments budget.  If they want to cut a budget, fine… tell the department head to lose a percentage of his budget.  But, let the department head decide what to lose, not a politician.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CQDMQB7RZFS3VXAAGE5UH5HLSI mestes

      I think it quite normal for a Council to choke at the thought of buying $3200 radios. In an age when an iPhone can be purchased for a fraction of the price, most people will question why $3200 is the cost for a huge handheld radio.

      Those knowledgeable about the technology know that an iPhone is an unsuitable tactical communications device, but also realize that the $3200 cost for a public safety handheld (up from $2800 in 1990) is the unfortunate result of an uncompetitive market.

      Police agencies are at the mercy of the incumbent radio vendor. Unless they can find the exact same radio and features being sold for less on a different municipal contract, they pretty much have no leverage. There is no “dealer” network for this equipment, you won’t find price wars on Amazon, because frankly, they are built to order, they don’t get dusty on a shelf.

      So what is the real cost? $700 or $3200? Somewhere in between? Only with competitive procurement practice can you begin to realize the fair cost.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chuck-Haggard/1388864196 Chuck Haggard

    I’ve been in law enforcement for 24 years now.  I worked back in the days when my department had only enough radios for one shift and a few extra.  This worked for the most part on most days.

    The issue became when guys had to work OT, then the radio was dead for the next guy coming on shift due to no time to recharge, or there weren’t enough radios to go around.

    Large special events, and really bad days like when the tornado of Nov 1989 hit led to having 2/3s of the department working without radios.

    Really, really bad idea to share radios.

    • Chris Bertolini

      $3,700 radios?  Really?  REALLY?  Buy extra batteries and keep one in the charger and change the battery every shift.  A $3,700 radio doesn’t need to “rest” after a shift.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chuck-Haggard/1388864196 Chuck Haggard

        And how many shifts have you worked having to coordinate sharing a radio with other shifts?

        The battery idea works, until they don’t budget for those either, which is another issue that I have seen, and recharging the same battery multiple times a day only goes so far before the batteries crap out, and then they don’t want to spend money on those either.

        Even with plenty of fresh batteries here is still the issue of large events, special events or emergencies, and at these times you have from half to an entire department working while only owning a shrift’s worth of radios.  That plan doesn’t work AT ALL, been there-done that.

        I know an officer who was almost beaten to death by an escaped convict when he out ran his partner during a foot pursuit, and the partner had the radio (two guys, one radio, no problem, right?).
        Officer was beaten so bad his scalp was pulled forward over his face like some sort of sick mask.
        I invite you to go tell that guy he doesn’t need his own radio.

        Bean counters don’t think an officer’s life is worth $3000, I’d respectfully invite said  bean counters to come work the street for awhile and test that logic.

        Pooled equipment gets beat up quicker, fact of life.  We have had individually issued radios for many years and these have lasted us the whole time without any problems. 
        The only reason many departments have to buy new radios now is a mandate from the Feds on interoperability, and digital radios systems being part of the mandate.

        Don’t blame the Chief or the “cops” for the radio issue, talk to the Feds.

        • RobertW

          I agree with Chuck Haggard that officers having to share radios is a bad idea due to the wear and stress on the equipment.  We have been issuing radios to each individual officer for several the past 20 years or so and on average we get about 12 years life out of each radio before having to replace them.  Each officer having his or her own Individual issued radio definitely comes in handy when something major happens and a department has more officers than normal on duty whether it is a pre-panned even or unplanned event.  It also improves the safety factor when officers work part-time jobs because they have the ability to immediately call for help if a situation deteriorates.

          Yes, there have been several unfunded mandates coming down from the federal government over the last few years such as narrowbanding and rebanding, but the purchase, installation and use of digital radios is not a mandate.  P25 is a recommended digital standard for public safety, but by no means is it a mandatory requirement that all public safety agencies switch to this technology.  Federal grants over the last few years have required that all radios purchase with the grant funding be P25 compliant, but here again this is not a mandate.  The decision by an agency to switch to P25, along with any other digital two-way radio technology, such as NEXEDGE and MotoTRBO, is simply at the discretion of the user agency, but more than likely as directed by their local radio shop or vendor. 

  • Deadbattery

    What are they going to be sharing next …. Handguns or maybe just the bullets if they haven’t use them on their last tour!!!!! Let the city rep stand in a dark ally talking to himself on a radio with a dead battery while he is being shot at.

  • EMA COM-L&T

    Maybe they should look at the Tait radios. They are compatable with the P25 system here and half the price of the BatWinged units.

  • SECOM SYSTEMS

    The PD is on an EDCAS system which is outdated, soon to be unsupported, and old technology.  Why would you continue to invest in this?  $3200 per radio is far too much for an EDCAS radio.  They should look at replacing the entire system with a new Digital system that is either P25 100% Compatible or a Digital System like the Kenwood NexEdge that is being widely used by Public Safety across the US at a fraction of the cost of what the City is budgeting over 5 years.  Be financially responsible.

  • Gary Diegelman

    Most of our portable radios maove officer identifiers on them. When you key it up communications has record what radio was keyed. Sharing radios throws out that concept.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CQDMQB7RZFS3VXAAGE5UH5HLSI mestes

    Unfortunately; Naples like many communities in Florida are saddled with one of the proprietary systems designed by the two major vendors Harris and Motorola. 

    There is a “standardized” system architecture called APCO 25 which has slowly over nearly 20 years of stagnation become a viable but still imperfect alternative. Even with this standard, communities need to employ a Consultant who will ensure that when replacing the system (which is costly) that they do not CONTINUE TO OWN a proprietary variation of the APCO 25. Unfortunately the vendors, realize that having proprietary features is in their best financial interest.

    Beware of “migration plans” etc when buying new radios from same vendor or when doing system “upgrades”. The cost of ownership can be very high.  A truly APCO 25 compliant system will allow communities to buy hand held and mobile radios on a competitive cost basis from numerous vendors and to inter-operate with other APCO 25 equipped communities. Without an experienced PSLMR Consultant, one who is independent and not remunerated by a vendor, communities often are swayed by emotional issues, fear uncertainty and doubt (FUD Factor) raised by the vendor.

    I can tell you from my experience, that there are at least three radio system vendors who could bid competitively for 99% of the Public Safety systems used by communities in Florida and that the technology exists to provide functional interoperability between any other agencies, regardless of their current technology. 

    When selecting a Consultant, please don’t stop at the suggestions provided by your radio system vendor. (Would you choose a lawyer suggested by your potentially soon to be ex-wife)? The Consultants which your radio vendor will not suggest are those who will look at your communities requirements and will suggest a cost effective and efficient solution to your requirements. The radio system vendors are more comfortable with Consultants who “rubber stamp” the designs proffered by them.

    http://www.leikhim.com

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CQDMQB7RZFS3VXAAGE5UH5HLSI mestes

    This should be the goal!
    “If you can find P25 radios in this range, even better.”