FCC Says PSAPs Must Be Able to Receive 9-1-1 Texts

Commission plans to ask for public input on how to transition to NG9-1-1

Julius Genachowski

Julius Genachowski

“It’s time to bring 9-1-1 into the digital age,” Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski said on Nov. 23 to public safety officials at the Arlington County Emergency Center in Arlington, Va.

Genachowski announced that in December he will launch a proceeding, as recommended in the National Broadband Plan, to get public input on how to transition the current system to broadband-enabled, Next Generation 9-1-1. This action builds on the FCC’s recent order beefing up 9-1-1 location-accuracy requirements so that first responders can quickly find people who reach out for help on their mobile phones.

“The current 9-1-1 system is efficient and reliable—handling more than 650,000 calls a day,” said Genachowski. “But today’s 9-1-1 system doesn’t support the communication tools of tomorrow. Many 9-1-1 call centers don’t even have broadband, and some are in communities where broadband isn’t even available. That is unacceptable.”

According to Genachowski, of those 650,000 daily calls to 9-1-1, 450,000 are made on mobile phones. “Even though mobile phones are the device of choice for most 9-1-1 callers, and we primarily use our phones to text, right now, you can’t text 9-1-1,” said Genachowski.

He pointed to the Virginia Tech campus shootings in 2007 as a reminder of the current technological limitations of 9-1-1. “Some students and witnesses tried to text 9-1-1 during that emergency, and as we know, those messages never went through and were never received by local 9-1-1 dispatchers,” he said.

For those who actually work in public safety communications, Genachowski’s comments should come as no surprise. The inability to text 9-1-1 has been a major discussion point at meetings and conferences for several years now. A white paper released in October by 4G Americas questioned the reliability of texting 9-1-1. “While we understand the desire to use SMS [short message service] to contact 9-1-1, SMS has significant limitations and shortcomings that do not make SMS suitable for emergency communications, especially under life-threatening conditions,” stated Chris Pearson, president of 4G Americas.

But that hasn’t stopped the public from trying to reach 9-1-1 via texts and social media. And many teenagers and young adults today don’t realize that they can’t reach 9-1-1 via text until they try. Many Americans, particularly those with disabilities, rely on texting as their primary means of communication. In some emergency situations—especially in circumstances where a call could further jeopardize someone’s life and safety—texting is the only way to reach out for help.

An American Red Cross survey released in August revealed that one in five respondents would try to contact emergency responders through an e-mail, Web site or social media. If Web users knew of someone else who needed help, 44% would ask other people in their social network to contact authorities, 35% would post a request for help directly on a response agency’s Facebook page, and 28% would send a direct Twitter message to responders.

The survey also found that Web users have clear expectations about how first responders should be answering their requests. Of the respondents, 69% said that emergency responders should be monitoring social media sites, and almost half believe a response agency is probably already responding to any urgent request they might see. Respondents also expect quick response to an online appeal for help; 74% expect help to arrive in less than an hour.

In March 2010, the FCC released its National Broadband Plan, which emphasized the development and deployment of Next Generation 9-1-1 systems to allow PSAPs to receive text, pictures and videos from the public and relay them to first responders. The chairman’s plan to get public input on how to transition the current system to NG9-1-1 builds on that base. Bringing 9-1-1 into the 21st century is one of the FCC’s key public safety priorities.

According to the FCC, the benefits of NG9-1-1 include the ability to text for help; real-time, rapid response; and automatic alerting.

“Broadband-enabled, Next-Generation 9-1-1 will revolutionize emergency response by providing increased means of communications — including texting, data, video and photo — which will improve situational awareness and rapid response,” said Genachowski. “There are tremendous benefits that would come with this capability, particularly for persons with disabilities or those individuals in emergencies who cannot speak to 9-1-1 dispatcher due to circumstances that could further jeopardize their life and safety. …

“While the need for action is clear, modernizing 9-1-1 raises complex challenges that will take not only time, but also significant coordination. We need to help of our federal, state and local partners, public safety, lawmakers, communications and broadband service providers, and equipment manufacturers to develop a national framework for Next-Generation 9-1-1 services across the nation. FCC staff recognize the importance of this work and what it takes and continue to work diligently with all interested parties to move this initiative forward.

“We at FCC are committed to working through these issues,” continued Genachowski. “Today, I call on all the key constituencies to work with us, and I expect that this proceeding will provide a vehicle for much-needed coordination and the opportunity to effectively deploy Next-Generation 9-1-1 across America.

In response to Genachowski’s comments, APCO International released a statement applauding Genachowski for his leadership in announcing a Notice of Inquiry on NG9-1-1 services.

“APCO International recognizes that advances in consumer technology are laying the groundwork for heightened public participation in emergency reporting and raising the public’s expectations about what our country’s public safety agencies can do with text messages, videos and photos when they contact 9-1-1. While this information is very important to emergency services, it should be acknowledged that our country’s public safety answering points are still developing a standardized method of collecting and disseminating this information to the most appropriate response teams during an emergency.

“Efforts to build Next Generation 9-1-1 systems must also be managed in close coordination with efforts to build a nationwide public safety broadband network, which will ensure that these communications reach the first responders whose safety and effectiveness are dependent on timely and accurate transmission and receipt of information.”

APCO is committed to working with the FCC to ensure consumers’ expectations of service run parallel to the development of NG9-1-1 systems throughout the country.

About the Author
Keri Losavio is the editor of APCO’s Public Safety Communications. She has more than 15 years of publishing experience, 12 of which have been spent in public safety.

Tags: , ,

  • TomS

    So is the FCC going to pay for the additional personnel needed to read, comprehend and appropriately route these text messages on top of everything else a communications technician has to do? I thought not. My priority at the desk is radio calls, 911, then phone calls. Text messages, especially with all the unintelligible abbreviations used today, will simply cause an even greater and more unreasonable workload for the comm tech, and will be gotten to when it becomes possible to get to them.

  • R__10

    “….we primarily use our phones to text, right now, you can’t text 9-1-1,”

    Placing a telephone call to speak with a 9-1-1 operator takes less than 1/3 of the time that it takes to type-out a text message and send it to the right PSAP. If a caller is driving while typing the message they could be puting people at additional risk. It sounds like a “nice-to-have” but the states and local govenrments have no way to pay for this. Maybe the commissioner is well compensated but there are a lot of people out of work. No paycheck, no income taxes to be paid by taxpayer, no money in the state’s pocket to pay for new ideas from the FCC. 9-1-1 services are for “emergency telephone calls”. US Postal Service is for mail. Computers are for email. Mobile devices that transmit and receive messages with other devices are conveniences available with technology. Declaring a mandate that governments have to follow commercial systems gets a little outside the scope of government-required services for now. Maybe when a few other things in technology and the economy come together it will be feasible. That could be less than ten years from now but it doesn’t look like at least a few more years.

  • Tinabartlett70

    FCC can mandate the capabilities of the PSAP’s and enforce compliance for them when it comes to what we can and should receive. But who is going to pay for this new technology in the PSAP’s? I’m sure that we will have to pay for these upgrades to our systems also. What I don’t understand is how come our PSAP still receives the majority of our wireless 911 calls as phase 1 which means we can not locate the caller if the caller is unable to tell us where they are. Our PSAP paid for our system to be able to receive this information from the cell companies, and yet the companies are not forced to provide it to us on all calls made from all of the different phones. I’m just wondering why anyone would want to add new technology on top of old technology that already isn’t working to its full potential? Typical government thinking in my opinion, lets spend money on it if it doesn’t work who cares as long as it sounded like a good idea then we will just move on to something else.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Quinde/20619759 Daniel Quinde

    911, radio, ACIC, alarms, non-emergency line, now, later texting, Facebook, and Twitter? Seems like I need to grow an extra hand to deal with the extra workload they’re wanting to put on me.

    It would also be very odd to see this Facebook news feed: “zomg der is a guy robbing bank!!!1″ with the “Like” button next to it.

    • Tinabartlett70

      I am in total agreement. However this is where we are going.

  • MrJim911

    This is NG911, we all knew it was coming and here it is. Upgrading our systems to be able to receive this type of info will be tricky but eventually it will be done just like it was done for handling those newfangled cellular telephone things. Texting 911 I don’t think will be a big deal. Chicago is already beta testing it to where callers can text 911 only after they have spoken to a Telecommunicator via voice.

    To say we should wait and not look at integrating these technologies into the 911 system is inviting 911 to fail into antiquity. We need to stay with or ahead of the curve, not let it pass us up.

  • Guest

    The back and forth conversation between a PSAP and a caller is necessary to establish a knowledge of the incident. This isn’t possible with texting and video. The PSAP needs to hear the caller to confirm the voice tone and excitement of the caller. A back and forth text exchange can’t do this and will take increase time and resources. The possibility of false 9-1-1 call will increase with anominous texting. Just because it is possible doesn’t nean that it it a good idea!

  • JCHP911

    we recently started getting 9-1-1 text calls here in Northern California at California Highway Patrol PSAP Communications Centers. It is very frustrating as it’s a computerized voice and doesnt know who to say appreciations or even commonly used texting applications . Took us 45 mins to get through to the cell provider and access where the text approx came from and the name of the party the phone was registered to. Add together it was a prepaid phone, we had NO INFO to go on, we just got lucky and had a repeat 9-1-1 offender and she kept doing it and finally slipped up and told us her name, WE GOT HER! 
    Not liking these those, people think they are texting and there locations are given, not the case!! 
    Frustrated 9-1-1 Dispatcher

  • Henjum

    Being too lazy to press 3 numbers, 9-1-1, is outrageous. If you’re really that incapable, put 9-1-1 on a speed dial number.  Use of text messaging should be for unique situations only where voice communications is not possible or not safe or for the hearing/speech impaired.  The anonymity of using text vs talking with a 9-1-1 call taker/dispatcher is only going add more abuse to the system than it’s already enduring.

    • Norcom911

      No… never put 911 on a speed-dial, because that causes mis-dials and pocket calls which already plague our centers. As you stated, 9-1-1 is meant to be easy to dial.

  • PSTKLD

    How dumb are people that they think they can get to reach 911 via social media or email?!? I understand why people think texting would be possible. Maybe texting should be possible. I really don’t think it would work well with all the crazy abbreviations, the time it takes to communicate back and forth in that manner (such as to get clarifying information), and the extra work for dispatchers. In a 911 call the dispatcher controls the conversation. While texting, there is very little control to be had.

  • sustantivo

    Why should we not, as emergency communications professionals, be blunt with the politicians, bureaucrats and other ignorant folks as to the total lack of hardware, software and reliability of texting to 911. And if those issues are solved, how cumbersome it will be to actually send responders where hep is needed.

    If we had a group of people wanting to summon and police, fire and EMS by blowing a whistle inside a duffel bag, are we obligated to jump through all the hoops necessary to do so, or do we simply and repectfully tell them to pound sand?

    Anyone who has ever actually been on the front lines of doing this job knows how impossible this will be to manage…leave it to those with their heads in the sand, and those who pander to emotional groups of constituents to make big promises to the public that others will have to keep.

    And guess who’ll take the beating when someone texts 911 for a murder in progress, a major structure fire, or a massive heart attack…and the system fails to deliver the details needed in order to dispatch the appropriate personnel…in a timely way, to the correct location, etc.???

    You got it, folks…it’ll be our backsides flapping in the breeze…

    We who might be involved in the early implementation need to give honest feedback to those who are making the decisions about this…I would not advocate we play it any way but fair and give it our best try, but if it proves to be as unwieldy as many of us fear, we need to inform those who make the determinations and document our arses off…

    And if they implement against the objections of the communications pros, then we’ll have plenty of ammo at our disposal when they come for our jobs.

    As has already been well stated…why is it more efficient to text for emergency help rather than dialing three simple numbers…9-1-1?

  • Jlockerbie

    Here is a thought, how about trying to educate the public on how 9-1-1 works and the limits of the system. How are we going to monitor the phone system and email/texting.  Should centers have calltakers and text takers? 

  • Jlockerbie

    I wonder if this gentleman has ever seen the inside of a communications center?